The educational technology sector has witnessed numerous challenges in recent years, but few incidents have generated as much controversy as the Boundless Learning layoffs that began in early 2024. What started as a routine corporate restructuring quickly became a cautionary tale about the human cost of private equity acquisitions and the volatile nature of the EdTech industry. The Boundless Learning layoffs not only affected hundreds of employees but also sent shockwaves through an industry already grappling with post-pandemic uncertainty and shifting market dynamics.
Background: From Pearson to Boundless Learning
To understand the full impact of the Boundless Learning layoffs, it’s essential to examine the company’s origins. Boundless Learning began its life as Pearson Online Learning Services (POLS), a division of the global education giant Pearson. In July 2023, private equity firm Regent LP acquired the unit for $851 million, marking one of the largest transactions in the Online Program Management (OPM) market. The acquisition was intended to create a nimble, independent company capable of competing in the increasingly crowded EdTech landscape.
However, the transition from Pearson ownership to private equity control proved tumultuous. The company specialized in digital platforms, workplace training, and partnerships with schools, universities, and corporations to deliver technology-driven education. Despite having empowered over 90,000 graduates globally and maintaining an impressive 95% student retention rate, the company faced significant operational challenges that would ultimately lead to widespread job cuts.
The Layoffs: A Shocking Execution
The Boundless Learning layoffs began on February 6, 2024, affecting approximately 15% of the workforce, though some sources suggest the actual number may have been closer to half the staff. The cuts impacted hundreds of employees across multiple departments, including sales, software development, marketing, and customer support teams. What made these layoffs particularly controversial wasn’t just the scale, but the manner in which they were executed.
Employees were terminated through mass Zoom calls where cameras and microphones were disabled, preventing any interaction or questions during the announcement. One former employee described being “in a teams call with roughly 30 others, mics muted, cameras off, chat disabled.” Within 30 minutes of the notification, the company cut off system access, leaving workers unable to retrieve personal files, hand over their work, or even send goodbye messages to colleagues.
The notification process itself was chaotic and inconsistent. Some employees received meeting invites while others learned about their termination through emails sent after the meetings had concluded. Laid-off workers lost immediate access to company emails, internal systems, and buildings, creating practical difficulties and emotional distress for those affected.
The Severance Controversy
Perhaps the most contentious aspect of the Boundless Learning layoffs was the absence of severance packages for terminated employees. In June 2023, shortly after the acquisition, Regent and Boundless Learning executives changed corporate policy to eliminate 401(k) matching and severance for layoffs. This policy change came despite executives’ claims that most American companies operate similarly, a statement that many industry observers disputed, particularly regarding the tech sector.
The lack of severance represented a stark departure from standard industry practices. Long-tenured employees who had dedicated years to building the company received no financial cushion to ease their transition. There was no payout for accumulated paid time off, no extended health insurance coverage, and no meaningful support services to help displaced workers find new employment. This approach drew sharp criticism from labor advocates, industry analysts, and affected employees who felt betrayed by an organization they had served loyally.
Legal and Ethical Implications
The manner in which the Boundless Learning layoffs were conducted raised questions about potential violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which requires employers to provide advance notice for mass layoffs under certain circumstances. The sudden nature of the terminations, combined with the lack of severance or meaningful support, suggested that the company may have prioritized cost-cutting over legal compliance and employee welfare.
Beyond legal concerns, the ethical dimensions of the layoffs sparked broader conversations about corporate responsibility in the private equity era. Former employees noted similarities between the Boundless Learning layoffs and those at Zulily, another Regent LP portfolio company, where workers reportedly experienced the same pattern: no severance, no paid time off payout, no insurance coverage, and impersonal mass meeting notifications. This consistency across portfolio companies suggested a systematic approach to cost reduction that prioritized shareholder returns over employee wellbeing.
Impact on Affected Employees
The human toll of the Boundless Learning layoffs extended far beyond lost paychecks. Many employees had relocated for their positions, taken on mortgages or other financial commitments based on employment stability, and built careers around the company’s mission. The sudden termination without severance left families scrambling to cover basic expenses, healthcare costs, and other necessities.
The psychological impact proved equally significant. The impersonal nature of the terminations, the inability to say proper goodbyes, and the immediate loss of digital access created feelings of worthlessness and disposability among affected workers. One former employee expressed their frustration, saying they couldn’t even send a goodbye message in Teams because access was already locked, calling the entire situation “an absolute joke of a company.”
For many, the experience shattered trust not just in Boundless Learning but in the EdTech sector as a whole. Professionals who had dedicated themselves to the mission of expanding educational access found themselves casualties of financial engineering and market pressures. The lack of career transition support, resume assistance, or counseling services made the job search even more challenging in an already difficult market.
Strategic Context: Why the Layoffs Happened
The Boundless Learning layoffs were precipitated by several factors, including the loss of Arizona State University as a client, which had contributed nearly 40% of POLS revenue, roughly $118 million out of $307 million in total revenue. The company also lost Ohio University, its third-largest client, creating a significant revenue gap that required drastic cost-cutting measures.
At a town hall meeting in July 2023, leadership announced major changes to the Maryville University contract, one of their largest accounts. The company would continue supporting only Maryville’s nursing programs while discontinuing numerous undergraduate and certificate programs. Executive leadership acknowledged they “had been expecting and embracing for, for months,” which led to a hiring freeze and cessation of backfilling vacant positions.
The acquisition structure itself created pressure for aggressive cost-cutting. Pearson’s payment for the sale was directly tied to adjusted EBITDA, with little offset for the cost of layoffs. This arrangement incentivized Regent LP to make cuts quickly and without the expense of severance packages, transferring costs and responsibilities that Pearson was unwilling or unable to bear.
Broader Implications for the EdTech Sector
The Boundless Learning layoffs highlighted systemic vulnerabilities within the EdTech industry. The post-pandemic era exposed business models heavily dependent on surging digital learning demand. As students returned to physical classrooms and online program enrollments stabilized or declined, companies that had scaled rapidly during COVID-19 found themselves overextended and under-resourced.
Industry experts have suggested that the OPM market is “on life support,” pointing to multiple shake-ups at major players. Companies like 2U, Noodle, and Wiley have all undergone significant restructuring, with some distancing themselves from the OPM label entirely. The market dynamics that once promised endless growth have given way to increased competition, regulatory scrutiny, and skepticism from university partners about the long-term viability of revenue-sharing arrangements.
The Boundless Learning layoffs also raised questions about the role of private equity in education. While private equity ownership can bring capital and operational expertise, it can also prioritize short-term financial returns over long-term sustainability and stakeholder welfare. The rapid policy changes, aggressive cost-cutting, and disregard for employee wellbeing demonstrated how private equity imperatives can conflict with the mission-driven nature of educational organizations.
Responses and Aftermath
In the wake of the Boundless Learning layoffs, affected employees took to social media, discussion boards, and review sites to share their experiences. Platforms like Glassdoor, TheLayoff, and LinkedIn became venues for workers to process their grief, warn others about the company’s practices, and build solidarity with fellow displaced professionals. These public accounts helped shine a light on corporate practices that might otherwise have remained hidden.
Boundless Learning CEO Kees Bol defended the layoffs as necessary steps to build financial foundation, declining to provide exact numbers but stating the company laid off roughly 30 percent across all levels and functions. The company announced plans to expand beyond higher education into other industries, creating what Bol described as a “branded marketplace” serving as a technology platform integrated with academic and non-academic partners.
However, industry analysts remained skeptical about the company’s evolving strategy. With frequent changes in direction and a damaged reputation among both employees and university partners, Boundless Learning faced significant challenges in rebuilding trust and establishing sustainable growth.
Lessons for the Industry
The Boundless Learning layoffs offer important lessons for EdTech companies, private equity firms, and the broader education sector. First, they underscore the importance of treating employees with dignity and respect, even during difficult transitions. The manner in which layoffs are conducted matters enormously, affecting not only displaced workers but also remaining staff, company reputation, and ability to attract talent in the future.
Second, the incident highlights risks inherent in revenue-sharing OPM models. When a few large clients constitute the majority of revenue, the loss of even one partnership can trigger cascading financial problems. EdTech companies need diversified revenue streams, sustainable business models, and realistic growth projections that don’t require perpetual market expansion.
Third, the experience demonstrates how acquisition structures can create perverse incentives that harm workers. When deal terms reward aggressive cost-cutting without accounting for severance or transition costs, employees become expendable variables in financial equations rather than valued contributors to organizational missions.
Finally, the Boundless Learning layoffs remind the education sector of the tension between commercial imperatives and educational values. While private capital can enable innovation and scaling, it can also conflict with the ethical commitments and social responsibilities that should characterize educational institutions and their partners.
Moving Forward
For affected employees, the path forward involves rebuilding careers, processing difficult experiences, and finding opportunities that align with their skills and values. Many have leveraged their networks, sought roles at more stable organizations, and in some cases, left the EdTech sector entirely.
For Boundless Learning, recovery requires more than strategic pivots and market expansions. The company must rebuild trust with employees, university partners, and the broader education community. This means demonstrating genuine commitment to ethical business practices, transparent communication, and respect for the people who make educational missions possible.
For the EdTech industry, the incident serves as a wake-up call about the need for sustainable business models, ethical leadership, and genuine commitment to the educational values that ostensibly motivate the sector. As the market continues evolving, companies must balance financial viability with social responsibility, innovation with stability, and growth ambitions with respect for the human beings whose work makes success possible.
Conclusion
The Boundless Learning layoffs represent more than a single company’s struggle or a routine corporate restructuring. They illuminate fundamental challenges facing the EdTech sector: unsustainable business models, the impact of private equity ownership, the human cost of financial engineering, and the gap between educational missions and commercial realities. While Boundless Learning’s future remains uncertain, the lessons from these layoffs should inform how the industry approaches growth, employment practices, and the balance between profit and purpose. Only by learning from these painful experiences can the EdTech sector build a more sustainable, ethical, and truly educational future.
About the Author
